Edvard Munch : His Style, Palette and Emotional Subject Matter

Introduction


Edvard Munch, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
The Scream, 1895
Edvard Munch (1863–1944), the Norwegian Symbolist and pioneer of Expressionism, is one of the most psychologically profound and artistically innovative painters in modern history. 

Best known for his iconic work The Scream, Munch's oeuvre spans more than six decades, marked by haunting visual narratives of love, death, anxiety, and human vulnerability. 

This is one of several versions of the painting The Scream. This version, executed in 1895 in pastel on cardboard, was sold on 2 May 2012 for $119,922,500 the highest nominal price paid for a painting at auction at that time.

His expressive use of line, bold palette, and emotionally charged subject matter forged a new language of modern art that transcended naturalism to reveal the unseen contours of the human soul. 

Here we will catch the signt of the art of Edvard Munch, tracing his life, artistic development, painting style, choice of palette, recurring subjects, influence from contemporaries, and detailed analysis of at least five major works, concluding with how his paintings are valued in the modern art market.

Life and Artistic Education

Born on December 12, 1863, in Løten, Norway, Edvard Munch grew up in Kristiania (now Oslo) in a deeply religious household overshadowed by illness and death. His mother died of tuberculosis when Munch was just five, and his sister Sophie died nine years later from the same disease. His father, a stern army doctor with a pietistic or religious outlook, often interpreted these tragedies as divine punishment. These early experiences left indelible marks on Munch's psyche, later surfacing vividly in his art.


Edvard Munch,
Public domain,
via Wikimedia Commons
Munch enrolled in a technical college in 1879 with the intent to become an engineer. However, frequent illnesses and his obsession with drawing led him to leave the college and pursue painting.

In 1881, he joined the Royal School of Art and Design in Kristiania, where he studied under sculptor Julius Middelthun and naturalist painter Christian Krohg. 

His early work reflected the influence of Impressionism and Naturalism, though by the mid-1880s he began gravitating toward Symbolism, as seen in his seminal work The Sick Child (1885–86).

In 1889, Munch traveled to Paris, where he encountered the works of Van Gogh, Gauguin, and Toulouse-Lautrec. The exposure profoundly shaped his visual language, freeing him from the rigid confines of academic painting and prompting a shift toward emotional and psychological themes. Over the next few decades, Munch developed a body of work that oscillated between despair and transcendence, capturing the fragile thresholds of human experience.

Painting Style and Techniques

Munch’s artistic style defies easy categorization, resisting confinement within the boundaries of any single movement. His evolution as an artist reflects a restless search for personal expression, one that saw him move through several distinct but interconnected phases: early Naturalism, Symbolism, and ultimately Expressionism. Yet, even as he adopted and transformed elements from these broader artistic movements, Munch’s work remained rooted in the deeply personal, often autobiographical, and psychologically complex themes that defined his vision of art. His aim was never merely to depict reality but to expose the inner world of the human spirit—to render visible the invisible anxieties, desires, and traumas that shaped human existence.

In his early years, Munch produced works that reflected a naturalistic style, influenced by his training at the Royal School of Art and Design in Kristiania (now Oslo). These initial paintings, such as Morning (1884), demonstrate a restrained and observational quality, attentive to light, shadow, and human anatomy. However, even in these formative pieces, a subtle emotional undertone can be detected—suggesting that Munch was already seeking to move beyond mere depiction. The real transformation began in the mid-1880s, with his pivotal painting The Sick Child (1885–86), which departed from realistic detail and instead sought to capture the emotional truth of grief and memory through rough brushwork and a subdued, almost sickly palette.


Edvard Munch, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
The Girls on the Bridge

As Munch’s artistic sensibilities developed, he immersed himself in the Symbolist movement, particularly after his influential stay in Paris in the late 1880s and early 1890s. 

He absorbed the ideas of Symbolist poets and painters who advocated for art as a means of expressing emotional and spiritual truths rather than tangible realities. 

This shift aligned with Munch’s belief that art should originate not from external appearances but from the depths of the artist’s psyche. 

The Symbolist tendency to use metaphor and suggestion deeply influenced Munch's compositions, in which landscapes, figures, and even architectural elements began to serve as symbols of emotional states—melancholy, desire, dread, and death.

Munch’s eventual affiliation with Expressionism was less a formal membership in a movement and more a natural extension of his personal vision. He became a forerunner of Expressionism rather than its follower. The German Expressionists of the early 20th century, such as Ernst Ludwig Kirchner and Emil Nolde, were themselves profoundly influenced by Munch’s innovations. What set him apart from others was his capacity to translate raw, internal turmoil into bold visual forms, long before such psychological themes became the currency of modern art.

A defining element of Munch’s style is his dynamic use of line. His line work often undulates across the canvas, coiling and bending like waves of emotion, rather than adhering to strict anatomical or perspectival rules. Faces are rarely symmetrical or serene; instead, they are masks of tension, despair, or longing. Bodies appear elongated or twisted, their proportions dictated not by physical accuracy but by emotional intensity. This departure from classical proportions allowed Munch to convey psychological tension and dissonance with unflinching honesty. For instance, in The Dance of Life (1899–1900), the figures seem caught in a dreamlike procession where each pose and posture reflects a different phase of love and loss.

Munch’s rejection of academic perspective also distinguishes his work. He deliberately flattens space, reducing the illusion of depth in favor of compositions that feel compressed and claustrophobic—reflecting the psychological weight of the subject matter. Traditional spatial cues are often missing or distorted. In The Scream (1893), for example, the bridge recedes unnaturally, creating a vertiginous effect, while the swirling sky engulfs the viewer in a vortex of panic. This disruption of spatial logic emphasizes the emotional over the rational, inviting the viewer into a disoriented, dreamlike realm.

The brushwork in Munch’s paintings varies widely, depending on the emotional register he seeks to convey. At times, his strokes are smooth and lyrical, flowing across the canvas in delicate waves. At other times, they become jagged, rough, or violently impastoed, lending his paintings a palpable sense of urgency and vulnerability. This painterly variation reinforces the psychological depth of his work. Paintings such as Ashes (1894) or Jealousy (1895) exhibit these varying textures, which echo the turbulence of the characters’ internal struggles.

One of the most fascinating and distinctive aspects of Munch’s artistic method is his frequent repetition of themes and motifs across multiple works, media, and decades. This is not mere duplication but a kind of obsessive return—a way of refining emotional truths through visual variation. The act of repetition allowed him to re-experience and reinterpret past events, much like how memories evolve over time. This cyclical process enabled Munch to deepen his understanding of his subjects and, in doing so, invited the viewer to consider the layers of meaning that each version reveals.

Perhaps the most famous example of this practice is The Scream, which exists in at least four major versions: two in paint (1893 and 1910), one in pastel (1895), and one in lithograph. Each iteration features the same skeletal figure on a bridge beneath a swirling red-orange sky, yet the emotional resonance differs subtly across versions. The 1893 tempera painting is raw and immediate; the 1895 pastel version, which fetched nearly $120 million at auction, is more refined and colorful; the 1910 version, painted after a period of mental illness, carries an even deeper sense of dread and desolation. Through these repetitions, Munch was not only seeking perfection of form but re-entering the emotional space that had first inspired the image.

Color Palette and Symbolic Use

Munch's use of color was revolutionary. He applied color not just for visual impact but as a psychological instrument. Early in his career, he favored a muted palette: cool greens, browns, and grays dominated his melancholic scenes. But after his Parisian encounters and his personal psychological deepening, his palette exploded into bold contrasts.

Colors in Munch’s work often signified specific emotional states. Blood red signaled love or violence; sickly green often suggested decay or spiritual malaise; twilight blues captured the ambiguity between life and death. In The Scream, the orange-red sky bleeds into a churning blue landscape, creating a visual equivalent of an existential panic attack.

His later work, painted after his nervous breakdown in 1908 and his retreat to the countryside, introduced lighter, more harmonious palettes. Soft greens, lavenders, and pale yellows became prominent as he turned to pastoral subjects, self-portraits, and landscapes, reflecting a more contemplative tone.

Recurring Themes and Subjects

Munch’s thematic universe was deeply autobiographical and symbolic. His subjects can be grouped into a few major categories:

  • Death and Illness: Inspired by personal losses, these works explore the borderlands of life. The Sick Child and Death in the Sickroom convey the agony of watching a loved one fade away.

  • Love and Anxiety: Relationships in Munch's work are seldom harmonious. Paintings like Vampire and The Kiss depict intimacy as something both redemptive and threatening.

  • Alienation and Existential Dread: Perhaps best captured in The Scream, Munch gave visual form to the anxieties of modern life.

  • Self-Portraiture: Munch obsessively painted himself, often as a vessel of suffering or introspection, as seen in Self-Portrait with Cigarette or Self-Portrait: Between the Clock and the Bed.

  • Nature and Rural Life: His later years saw a turn toward more tranquil subjects: farmers working fields, people bathing, or serene Norwegian landscapes.

Influence of Contemporary Artists

Though uniquely original, Munch absorbed influences from many artists. From Van Gogh he inherited expressive brushwork and emotional immediacy. Gauguin's flat planes and symbolic colors offered Munch a new way to convey inner life. Toulouse-Lautrec’s urban themes and poster-like aesthetic showed him the power of simplified form and line. Symbolist poets like Baudelaire and contemporaries in the Kristiania bohemian scene also shaped his thematic choices.

Munch’s art deeply influenced the German Expressionists. Die Brücke artists like Ernst Ludwig Kirchner adopted his emotionally charged forms and social themes. Munch also paved the way for later psychological painters like Francis Bacon, who similarly dissected the tormented human psyche on canvas.

Symbolism and Expressionism in Painting: The Emotional Universe of Edvard Munch


Edvard Munch, Public domain,
via Wikimedia Commons
Edvard Munch,
The Scream, 1910.

The transition from the 19th to the 20th century marked a turning point in the history of painting. It was a period of emotional, psychological, and philosophical awakening in art, when traditional realism gave way to introspection and abstraction. Two significant movements—Symbolism and Expressionism—emerged as conduits for exploring the subconscious, spiritual anguish, love, death, and alienation. 

At the heart of this transformation stood the Norwegian painter Edvard Munch, whose works became emblematic of emotional intensity and existential dread.

Munch is best known for The Scream, a painting that has become a universal icon of anxiety. But his significance goes far beyond this single image. His art bridged the worlds of Symbolism and Expressionism, foreshadowing modern psychological art and influencing generations of painters, poets, and filmmakers. This essay delves into the Symbolist and Expressionist painting movements with Munch as the central figure, exploring how his deeply personal style defined an era of inner turmoil and visionary creativity.

Symbolism in Painting: The Inner World Comes Alive

Symbolism emerged in the late 19th century as a reaction against realism and naturalism. While Realist artists sought to depict the visible world, Symbolists delved into the invisible: emotions, dreams, fears, and metaphysical truths. Rather than direct representation, they favored suggestive imagery, metaphor, and mythological or allegorical content.

In painting, Symbolism became a vehicle for spiritual exploration. Artists like Gustave Moreau, Odilon Redon, and Fernand Khnopff created fantastical worlds infused with mystery, eroticism, and mysticism. Their work reflected the era’s growing interest in psychology, mysticism, religion, and death—themes that would also dominate Munch’s canvas.

Expressionism: The Soul Exposed Through Color and Form


Edvard Munch, Public domain,
via Wikimedia Commons
The Girls on the Bridge

While Symbolism turned inward, Expressionism, which matured in the early 20th century, amplified emotional experience through bold color, distorted forms, and raw brushwork. Rather than depicting external reality, Expressionists conveyed subjective experience—fear, loneliness, joy, and rage—with unflinching intensity.

Expressionist artists such as Egon Schiele, Oskar Kokoschka, and later, members of German groups like Die Brücke and Der Blaue Reiter, created paintings that were often confrontational, spiritual, and socially critical. 

Their work was deeply indebted to Edvard Munch, who provided a bridge from Symbolism to this more visceral mode of painting.

Edvard Munch: A Painter Between Worlds

Born in 1863 in Løten, Norway, Edvard Munch endured a childhood marked by trauma. His mother died of tuberculosis when he was five, followed by his favorite sister a few years later. His father, a strict religious man, instilled in him an acute awareness of death, guilt, and existential dread. These early experiences became the emotional bedrock of his art.

Munch studied at the Royal School of Art and Design in Kristiania (modern-day Oslo), where he encountered naturalism and Impressionism. But he quickly moved beyond these styles, seeking not just to paint what he saw, but what he felt. His motto, "I do not paint what I see but what I saw," revealed his inward gaze and commitment to emotional truth.

The Scream: Icon of the Expressionist Psyche

Painted in 1893, The Scream is arguably Munch’s most famous work and the quintessential Expressionist painting. A genderless, distorted figure stands on a bridge, clutching its face in terror, while a blood-red sky swirls behind it. The landscape itself seems to cry out in anguish.

Inspired by a panic attack Munch experienced while walking in Oslo, the painting captures an existential moment of inner collapse. It reflects not just personal anxiety but the broader spiritual and social anxieties of the time—urbanization, alienation, and the fragility of the modern psyche.

The Scream exemplifies the key elements of both Symbolism and Expressionism:

  • Symbolist in its representation of an abstract emotional state using suggestive imagery and metaphor.

  • Expressionist in its distorted form, unnatural color palette, and intense emotional charge.

Munch created several versions of The Scream, including lithographs and pastels, which helped spread its image across Europe and influence the burgeoning Expressionist movement.

The Frieze of Life: Love, Anxiety, and Death

Munch’s most ambitious project, The Frieze of Life, was a thematic series of paintings that explored the cycle of human experience, focusing on love, jealousy, illness, fear, and mortality. Some of the most iconic works in this series include:

1. Madonna (1894–1895)

A sensual yet unsettling portrayal of a nude woman, Madonna combines eroticism with mysticism. The swirling red halo and ambiguous facial expression blur the line between divine ecstasy and carnal surrender. The painting exemplifies Symbolist interest in the femme fatale and spiritual dualities.

2. The Dance of Life (1899–1900)

This painting shows women at different stages of life, dancing with a central male figure. The woman in white symbolizes innocence, the woman in red, passion, and the woman in black, death or mourning. The work visualizes the passage of time and the transience of love.

3. Ashes (1894)

Depicting the aftermath of a romantic encounter, Ashes features a woman disheveled and shamed, while a man hides his face in guilt. The work captures emotional devastation with symbolic use of color—fiery reds, cold grays—and a psychologically charged composition.

Munch’s work during this period blurred the lines between Symbolism’s metaphysical themes and Expressionism’s personal anguish. Each painting was a confession, a psychological landscape rendered in flesh, fabric, and paint.

Color and Form as Emotional Language

Munch’s use of color was revolutionary. He moved away from natural tones, favoring symbolic and expressive hues. Reds symbolized blood and passion, blues and grays evoked melancholy, while yellow suggested decay or madness.

His line work was equally emotive—often undulating, coiling, or spiraling around figures. Perspective was frequently flattened or distorted, placing emotional truth above spatial logic. Figures appear spectral, with mask-like faces and elongated limbs, emphasizing psychological alienation.

These techniques would influence Expressionist painters such as Emil Nolde, Ernst Ludwig Kirchner, and Edvard Heckel, who embraced distortion and abstraction as vehicles for emotion.

The Influence of Literature and Psychology

Munch’s art was deeply informed by contemporary literature and science. He was influenced by Symbolist poets like Charles Baudelaire and Stéphane Mallarmé, whose works explored decadence, desire, and death. He also read Henrik Ibsen, August Strindberg, and Fyodor Dostoevsky, writers who focused on existential dilemmas and the human soul’s torments.

Moreover, the rise of psychology—particularly the ideas of Sigmund Freud—resonated with Munch. He was fascinated by dreams, repression, and the subconscious, long before Surrealists would turn these concepts into artistic methods. His paintings often depict internal emotional states with haunting clarity, making him a forerunner of psychological and existential art.

Isolation and Personal Struggles

Munch's life was plagued by mental illness, depression, and alcoholism. In 1908, he suffered a severe breakdown and was hospitalized in Copenhagen. This period of crisis led to stylistic changes in his later work, which became slightly brighter and more restrained, though no less introspective.

Paintings like Self-Portrait with the Spanish Flu (1919–1920) reflect his ongoing preoccupation with mortality. In this haunting image, the sickly artist stares from his chair with hollow eyes, surrounded by an atmosphere of stillness and decay.

Even in isolation, Munch continued to paint, producing a vast body of work that chronicled not only his own suffering but the spiritual climate of modern Europe.

Munch’s Legacy in Modern Art

Edvard Munch left an indelible mark on the development of 20th-century art. His ability to render invisible states of mind with visceral intensity paved the way for:

  • German Expressionism (Die Brücke, Der Blaue Reiter)

  • Abstract Expressionism (Jackson Pollock, Mark Rothko)

  • Surrealism (Salvador Dalí, Max Ernst)

  • Modern psychological portraiture

His raw, personal style broke with academic conventions, prioritizing emotion over perfection, confession over narrative, and sensation over decorum. In doing so, he laid the foundation for art as a deeply subjective, transformative act.

Today, Munch’s paintings are housed in major museums, including:

  • The Munch Museum, Oslo

  • The National Gallery, Oslo

  • The Museum of Modern Art, New York

  • The Tate Gallery, London

His works remain the subject of intense study, exhibitions, and reinterpretation—proof of their timeless resonance.

Analysis of Five Major Paintings


Edvard Munch, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
The Sick Child
Norwegian National Gallery (Oslo, Norway)

1. The Sick Child (1885–86)

This painting marks a pivotal moment in Munch's career, as he broke with realism to focus on emotional truth. 

Inspired by the death of his sister Sophie, the canvas shows a pale, bedridden girl attended by a grieving woman. 

Munch employed thick, agitated brushstrokes and an unusually pale palette, with icy greens and whites that evoke fragility.

Though initially rejected by critics, Munch returned to the composition multiple times, producing several versions. 

The visual dissonance between unfinished brushwork and focused emotion mirrors memory's fragmentation and grief's inescapability.

2. The Scream (1893)


Edvard Munch, Public domain,
via Wikimedia Commons
Edvard Munch, The Scream, 1910.

Among the vast oeuvre of modern art, few images have etched themselves into the collective human consciousness as deeply as Edvard Munch’s The Scream

With its nightmarish simplicity and raw emotional impact, the painting captures a moment of unfiltered psychological intensity—a wordless cry that transcends language and culture. 

Often described as the visual embodiment of existential dread, The Scream has become an icon of modern anxiety, standing as both a personal confession and a universal symbol.

At first glance, the composition strikes the viewer with disorienting immediacy. 

A distorted, sexless figure stands in the foreground of a curving bridge, clutching its skull-like head in a gesture of horror. Its eyes are hollow, its mouth wide open in a soundless howl. Around the central figure, the world itself appears to convulse. The sky swirls in a maelstrom of blood-red and flaming orange. The fjord and hills beyond pulse with fluid lines that echo the figure’s inner anguish. The landscape, like the figure, seems to scream.

Edvard Munch, a Norwegian artist often associated with Symbolism and a precursor of Expressionism, painted four known versions of The Scream between 1893 and 1910—two in tempera, one in pastel, and one as a lithograph. The first version, made in 1893 in tempera and crayon on cardboard, is housed in the National Gallery of Norway. A pastel version from the same year was sold at auction in 2012 for nearly $120 million, making it one of the most expensive artworks ever sold at the time. Munch also created a black-and-white lithograph version in 1895, which allowed for wider reproduction and contributed to the image’s widespread recognition.

The inspiration for The Scream is intimately autobiographical. In one of his diary entries from 1892, Munch recalled a walk with two friends on a hillside overlooking Oslofjord. As they continued ahead, he paused: “The sun was setting — the clouds turned blood red... I sensed a scream passing through nature. I felt the cry... I painted this picture, painted the clouds as actual blood.” This revelation—this sensation of hearing the earth itself shriek—was not merely a metaphor for anguish. It was Munch’s synesthetic fusion of sight, sound, and emotion. His perception of reality was unmoored by trauma and anxiety, and The Scream emerged not as a depiction of an event, but as an emotional state—a landscape of the mind.

The setting of the painting is not imaginary. It is based on a real place—Ekeberg Hill in Oslo (then called Kristiania), from which one can see the Oslofjord. Munch’s sister was hospitalized in a mental institution near that location, and some art historians speculate that his association with the area was fraught with personal trauma and grief. These deeply felt memories became encoded in the physical geography of the painting. Yet Munch dissolves the naturalistic landscape into abstraction, allowing emotion to reshape space and time. The straight lines of the bridge contrast violently with the undulating forms of the background, creating a visual tension that reinforces the psychological chaos of the moment.

While the central figure appears human, it is alien in form—a ghostlike, androgynous being, devoid of individual traits. It is less a portrait than a cipher for universal human vulnerability. Scholars have suggested that its skeletal face may have been inspired by Peruvian mummies Munch saw at a museum, or by the phantoms in Symbolist literature. What is clear is that the figure is not intended to be a realistic person, but rather an abstraction of suffering itself. It becomes a mirror in which viewers see their own fear, anxiety, and isolation reflected.


Edvard Munch, Public domain,
 via Wikimedia Commons
The Scream, 1893
Munch’s use of color in The Scream is particularly significant. The violent reds and oranges of the sky clash with the deep blues and blacks of the water and land, evoking not only the drama of a sunset but also a psychological and cosmic dissonance. 

The fiery sky has been interpreted as symbolic of apocalypse or divine wrath, while others point to real environmental phenomena—such as the vibrant sunsets seen worldwide after the eruption of Krakatoa in 1883. 

Whatever the source, the colors intensify the emotional impact, making the painting feel not just seen but felt.

The painting is rich in symbolism but remains open to multiple interpretations. It has been read through the lenses of psychology, philosophy, and cultural criticism. 

Freudians see it as an expression of suppressed trauma and the terror of the unconscious. Existentialists interpret it as a visual allegory of modern man’s alienation in an indifferent universe. Feminists have considered the figure’s androgyny as a statement on gender ambiguity and inner fragmentation. No single reading can exhaust its meaning, which is part of what makes the painting so enduring.

The formal aspects of The Scream also anticipate modernist developments in art. Munch’s distorted perspective, expressive line, and symbolic color place him at the forefront of Expressionism, a movement that would flourish in Germany in the early 20th century. Artists like Egon Schiele, Ernst Ludwig Kirchner, and Emil Nolde drew heavily from Munch’s example, seeking to paint not what they saw but what they felt. In this sense, The Scream broke decisively from academic traditions of realism and instead gave primacy to the subjective and emotional truth of the artist.

Moreover, The Scream resonates across disciplines. In literature, it parallels the works of Dostoevsky and Kafka, who explored existential anxiety and the absurdity of modern life. In music, its silent wail is echoed in the dissonant harmonies of composers like Schoenberg and Mahler. In cinema, it foreshadows the psychological horror and surrealist imagery of films by Ingmar Bergman and David Lynch. Even in contemporary pop culture, the image has been widely reproduced, parodied, and commodified—from cartoons to T-shirts to emojis—attesting to its status as a cultural shorthand for despair.

The figure’s scream is paradoxical—it is silent in the painting, and yet we hear it within ourselves. This internal resonance may explain the painting’s enduring power. In an era marked by war, dislocation, alienation, and spiritual emptiness, The Scream gives form to feelings that are often unspoken. It does not offer consolation or resolution; instead, it acknowledges the terror that lies beneath the surface of consciousness. In doing so, it offers a kind of solidarity: the recognition that we are not alone in our fear.

In the context of Munch’s broader body of work, The Scream is part of his Frieze of Life series, a group of paintings exploring themes such as love, anxiety, illness, and death. This philosophical framing adds another layer to the painting’s meaning. It is not simply a cry of individual anguish, but part of a larger reflection on the human condition. Munch once said, “I do not paint what I see, but what I saw.” In The Scream, what he saw was not the outer world, but the inner abyss.

Today, The Scream hangs in museums, sells for record-breaking prices, and is instantly recognizable worldwide. But its value lies not in its fame or monetary worth. Its true significance is that it dares to confront what most art avoids: the raw, uncontainable terror that sometimes overtakes the human soul. It is a painting that does not look away—and it demands that we do not, either.

3. Vampire (1893–94)

This ambiguous painting, also called Love and Pain, portrays a woman with flowing red hair kissing or biting a man’s neck. The man bows, seemingly in emotional or physical surrender. Critics dubbed her a "vampire," but Munch resisted the label, insisting it depicted a tender moment of love.

The composition is rendered in warm reds and blacks, creating an atmosphere of eroticism and danger. The ambiguous fusion of lover and predator encapsulates Munch's view of romantic relationships as simultaneously alluring and consuming. One version of Vampire sold for over $38 million in 2008.


Edvard Munch, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
The Girls on the Bridge

4. Girls on a Bridge (1902)

Set in the idyllic coastal town of Åsgårdstrand, this painting shows young girls standing pensively on a wooden bridge. 

Although a serene scene at first glance, the mood is melancholic, reinforced by the elongated figures and subdued palette.

The painting reflects Munch's interest in the transitional moments of life—youth, waiting, longing. Repetition of color and pattern lends the composition rhythmic unity. 

Several versions exist, with one selling for $54.2 million in 2016.

5. Self-Portrait: Between the Clock and the Bed (1940–43)


Edvard Munch, Public domain,
 via Wikimedia Commons
Self-Portrait. Between
the Clock and the Bed
One of Munch’s final works, this haunting self-portrait captures him standing between two powerful symbols: a grandfather clock (time) and a bed (death). 

His gaze is tired yet defiant, the face lined with age.

The background includes references to his earlier paintings, creating a retrospective ambiance. 

Painted during WWII and near the end of his life, the work is somber and philosophical, capturing Munch’s lifelong meditation on mortality.

Market Value and Auction Records

Edvard Munch’s paintings are among the most expensive ever sold. The Scream pastel version sold for $119.9 million in 2012 at Sotheby’s New York, setting a then world record. Other significant sales include:

  • Girls on a Bridge (1902): $54.2 million in 2016.

  • Vampire (1893–94): $38.16 million in 2008.

  • Summer Day (1904): Approximately $20.4 million in 2021.

  • Dance on the Beach (1906–07): Over $20 million in 2023.

  • Self-Portrait with Palette (1926): Sold for approximately $4.5 million in 2021.

Munch's market has seen steady growth. According to Sotheby’s, works by Munch resold between 2003 and 2017 appreciated at an annual rate of 9.4%. Even lesser-known works or lithographs can fetch hundreds of thousands.

Conclusion: Edvard Munch and the Soul of Modern Painting

Symbolism and Expressionism emerged as powerful alternatives to the rationalism and materialism of the 19th century, offering artists a means to explore the invisible dimensions of human life. At the center of this evolution stood Edvard Munch, whose haunting paintings captured the universal struggles of love, death, anxiety, and longing.

Through distorted forms, emotive color, and psychological themes, Munch revolutionized the language of painting. He turned the canvas into a mirror of the soul—a place where fear and beauty could coexist. His legacy continues not just in museums but in every artist who dares to express the inexpressible.

Munch didn’t merely paint faces or bodies; he painted existence itself, with all its tremors and silences. In the scream of one solitary figure, we hear the echo of our own doubts, hopes, and humanity.

Edvard Munch was not merely a painter of scenes but of psychological realities. He tore open the veil of surface beauty to reveal the depths of anguish, desire, and existential dread. Through innovative use of line, form, and color, he forged a path that liberated modern art from representation and redirected it toward emotional and symbolic expression.

His legacy endures not just in galleries and auction houses but in the way we visually understand anxiety, alienation, and human frailty. His paintings are not just viewed—they are experienced, felt, and remembered.

In the ever-competitive art market, Munch remains a titan. His visual language continues to resonate with collectors, curators, and art lovers alike, making him not only a master of modernism but also a seer of the human condition. The scream that echoed through nature still echoes through us all.

Some of the im,portant words used in this composition: Symbolism in painting, Expressionism movement, Edvard Munch paintings, The Scream analysis, Symbolist artists, Expressionist painters, psychological art, Edvard Munch biography, Frieze of Life, modern art origins, emotional painting style, existential art, Munch museum Oslo, Edvard Munch’s legacy.