1. Introduction
 |
Kazimir Malevich, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons Suprematist Composition |
It is a crystallization of the Suprematist movement—a radical departure from representational imagery toward the “supremacy of pure feeling” through geometric abstraction. In the early 20th century, Malevich sought to liberate art from the constraints of object depiction, creating works that transcended material reality to evoke universal truths.
Today, this painting is celebrated not only for its formal innovations but also for its historical significance, its role in shaping modern art, and its status as the most expensive work of Russian art ever sold—$85.8 million at Christie’s in 2018.
In this essay and composition, we will explore Malevich’s deliberate use of color, his stylistic and technical approach, the texture and brushwork of the painting, his methods, detailed comparisons with other masterworks, and the record-breaking journey of this piece in the art market.
2. Historical Context: The Birth of Suprematism
By 1915, the world of art was undergoing seismic change. The Cubists in Paris were dismantling traditional perspective, the Futurists in Italy were glorifying speed and technology, and Russia was on the brink of revolution. Malevich—born in Kyiv in 1879—absorbed these influences yet envisioned something even more radical.
In December 1915, at the “Last Futurist Exhibition of Paintings 0.10” in Petrograd, Malevich presented his Black Square—a solid black square on a white background—positioned in the “icon corner” traditionally reserved for religious images. This act was both symbolic and provocative: it replaced centuries of religious and realist painting with a new, spiritual abstraction.
Suprematism, as he defined it, was not merely an aesthetic style but a philosophical approach. It sought to depict pure artistic feeling through simple geometric shapes and limited colors. Suprematist Composition was created at the height of this movement in 1916, embodying its principles while expanding its visual vocabulary.
3. Color Choice and Theory in Suprematist Composition
|
Kazimir Malevich, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons Suprematist Composition |
Malevich’s use of color in Suprematist Composition is far from arbitrary—it reflects a careful orchestration of contrasts, tensions, and harmonies.
3.1 Primary and Secondary Colors
The dominant blue rectangle and red beam create an intense chromatic dialogue. Blue, often associated with calmness and infinity, contrasts with the dynamic, assertive red. The additional accents of yellow and green provide secondary visual anchors, creating a rhythm across the canvas.
3.2 White as Infinite Space
The white background is not “empty” but represents an infinite, non-objective space—a void in which the geometric shapes float, unbound by earthly gravity. In Malevich’s words, white was “the free white sea of infinity.”
3.3 Flatness and Purity
Each color is applied in a flat, unmodulated way, avoiding shading or perspective. This strengthens the sense that the forms exist outside the physical world, in a spiritual dimension.
4. Style of Painting: Suprematist Minimalism and Spatial Dynamics
Suprematism is often described as minimalist, but in Suprematist Composition, the interplay of shapes suggests a complex, almost cosmic movement.
-
Dynamic Equilibrium: The blue rectangle appears to rest yet also press against the red beam, as if in quiet collision.
-
Non-Earthly Perspective: Unlike Cubism, which still references multiple perspectives of physical objects, Suprematism eliminates any reference to the real world.
-
Spatial Ambiguity: The shapes could be floating in zero gravity, or they could be diagrammatic representations of unseen energies.
5. Brushwork and Texture
Although the work is dominated by flat geometric forms, Malevich’s hand is still evident:
-
Edges and Precision: The shapes have clean borders, but subtle imperfections remind us of the human element—no mechanical stenciling was used.
-
Surface Variation: Even in the white background, slight tonal changes and brush marks catch the light differently, adding quiet depth.
-
Oil Medium: The richness of oil paint gives the colors a density and saturation impossible with early acrylics.
6. How Malevich Painted It: The Process
While there are no surviving photographs of Malevich creating this exact work, scholars reconstruct his process from similar pieces:
-
Preliminary Sketching – Malevich was known to create small paper studies to test arrangements of shapes.
-
Base Layer – A white gesso ground prepared the canvas, followed by an even coat of white oil paint.
-
Shape Placement – He likely outlined geometric forms in pencil or charcoal, adjusting until the composition achieved balance.
-
Color Application – Using flat brushes, he filled shapes with pure, unmixed colors.
-
Layering and Correction – If a shape’s edge wavered, he would repaint sections of the white background to sharpen it.
The deliberate nature of this method ensured that each geometric element resonated with precision.
7. Comparisons with Other Works
7.1 Black Square (Malevich, 1915)
-
Similarity: Both works reject representational imagery in favor of pure geometry.
-
Difference: Black Square is a manifesto of reduction, while Suprematist Composition is a sophisticated orchestration of color and form.
7.2 White on White (Malevich, 1918)
-
Similarity: Both explore spatial relationships through minimalism.
-
Difference: White on White is ethereal and almost invisible; Suprematist Composition is bold and dynamic.
Wassily Kandinsky, Public domain,
via Wikimedia Commons
Composition VII—Kandinsky
7.3 Composition VIII (Kandinsky, 1923)
Wassily Kandinsky, Public domain,
via Wikimedia Commons
Composition VII—Kandinsky
-
Similarity: Shared use of geometric abstraction and strong colors.
-
Difference: For Wassily Kandinsky, art was like music, with colors and forms dancing in improvisational harmony. His abstract compositions aimed to evoke spiritual and emotional responses, much like a symphony. Conversely, Kazimir Malevich's work was more static and metaphysical. His Suprematist art, characterized by fundamental geometric shapes and a limited color palette, sought to transcend the material world, offering a window into a higher, non-objective reality.
7.4 Broadway Boogie Woogie (Piet Mondrian, 1942–43)
-
Similarity: Flat colors, geometric shapes, and a grid-like spatial order.
-
Difference: Mondrian’s composition vibrates with urban rhythm, while Malevich’s floats in cosmic stillness.
Selena N. B. H., CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons
Homage to Square—Josef Albers
7.5 Homage to the Square (Josef Albers, 1950s–70s)
Selena N. B. H., CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons
Homage to Square—Josef Albers
-
Similarity: Pure color fields arranged in geometric order.
-
Difference: Joseph Albers explored how colors interact, influencing each other based on their arrangement and context. His work meticulously demonstrates the subjective experience of color, showing how our perception changes with different juxtapositions. In contrast, Kazimir Malevich employed color within a philosophical abstraction, aiming to convey spiritual and universal concepts beyond mere visual representation. For Malevich, color was a tool to express pure feeling and non-objective reality, a component of his broader Suprematist ideology that sought to transcend the material world through fundamental geometric forms and pure color.
8. Auction History and Market Impact
| Year | Auction House | Price | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | Sotheby’s NY | $60 million | After restitution to Malevich’s heirs from the Stedelijk Museum, Amsterdam |
| 2018 | Christie’s NY | $85.8 million | New record for Russian art; purchased by dealer Brett Gorvy; exceeded $70M estimate |
The 2018 sale made Suprematist Composition not just an art historical milestone but also a market-defining event. It placed Malevich in the elite circle of artists whose works have crossed the $80 million mark—alongside Monet, Picasso, and Basquiat.
9. Legacy and Influence
Malevich’s Suprematist Composition influenced countless movements, from the Bauhaus to Minimalism and Conceptual Art. Artists like El Lissitzky, Alexander Rodchenko, and later American minimalists such as Donald Judd drew from his reductionist yet spiritual approach.
In contemporary times, the work is frequently cited in discussions of design and branding—its clean shapes and bold contrasts resonate with the language of modern visual communication.
10. Conclusion
Suprematist Composition is not merely a painting—it is a philosophical statement in pigment and geometry. Through its refined use of color, its exacting composition, and its historical context, it represents the pinnacle of Suprematist ideals.
The painting bridges the gap between the stark revolution of Black Square and the later purity of White on White, while dialoguing with the broader tradition of abstract art—from Kandinsky’s spiritual geometry to Mondrian’s precise grids.
Its journey from Malevich’s studio in 1916 to an $85.8 million auction in 2018 is a testament to the enduring power of pure abstraction. More than a century after its creation, Suprematist Composition continues to invite viewers into a realm beyond the material—a realm of infinite space, floating color, and pure feeling.
